Thank you very much.
Would it be possible to include this fix into 5.0.8 version?
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Simba
Donor
Joined: 24 Feb 2012
Posts: 18 |
Posted: 26 Jun 2012 10:39
Hello, i am sorry if this had been requested before.
I am aware of "Transfer each file individually in background" setting, but it does not work with folders. For example, i drag n drop folder from server to my computer. It gets all files recursively and processes one file at the time. There are many small files, that takes tremendous amount of time! I have set "Maximum number of transfers at the same time" to 5, but as i said i get only one download at time! Would it be possible to do that "Maximum number of transfers at the same time" would actually take 5 files from the file queue and would download them at once? Like Filezila does. Thank you |
| Advertisements |
|
|
prikryl
Site Admin
Joined: 10 Dec 2002
Posts: 16452 Location: Prague, Czech republic |
Posted: 28 Jun 2012
Thanks for your suggestion.
This request has been added to the tracker: http://winscp.net/tracker/show_bug.cgi?id=875 _________________ Martin Prikryl |
|
Simba
Donor
Joined: 24 Feb 2012
Posts: 18 |
Posted: 5 Jul 2012 16:16
Thank you very much.
Would it be possible to include this fix into 5.0.8 version? |
|
prikryl
Site Admin
Joined: 10 Dec 2002
Posts: 16452 Location: Prague, Czech republic |
Posted: 9 Jul 2012
Simba wrote: Thank you very much.
Would it be possible to include this fix into 5.0.8 version? Sorry, no way. That's too big change. _________________ Martin Prikryl |
|
Simba
Donor
Joined: 24 Feb 2012
Posts: 18 |
Posted: 8 Aug 2012 20:46
Hello,
Thanks for the new release! It is more stable. I would like to ask if you could increase this issue higher in the tracker. There are many not important changes way up than 875 ID. This would be great addition to see in WinSCP 5 ! I would make another donation for your super work! What others are thinking, is it good feature that should be included in the next release? Thanks |
|
dominik
Joined: 21 Nov 2012
Posts: 7 |
Posted: 3 Dec 2012 01:30
I would vote for this feature, if there was a voting system.
Thanks for the good work anyway. |
|
ds
Guest |
Posted: 10 Dec 2012 14:52
Having just switched from FileZilla to WinSCP for its master password functionality, this is the only thing that I have found missing in WinSCP. A common use case is to transfer a large directory tree and this would be much faster if the downloads could be queued recursively.
For now, I am working around the issue by queuing multiple subfolders at a time, but towards the end of the transfer this usually leaves the largest subfolder transferring one file at a time, which is needlessly slow. Thanks for the otherwise great software! |
|
prikryl
Site Admin
Joined: 10 Dec 2002
Posts: 16452 Location: Prague, Czech republic |
Posted: 10 Dec 2012
ds wrote: Having just switched from FileZilla to WinSCP for its master password functionality, this is the only thing that I have found missing in WinSCP. A common use case is to transfer a large directory tree and this would be much faster if the downloads could be queued recursively.
For now, I am working around the issue by queuing multiple subfolders at a time, but towards the end of the transfer this usually leaves the largest subfolder transferring one file at a time, which is needlessly slow. Thanks for your feedback and the donation! Taking it into account |
| Advertisements |
|
You can post new topics in this forum
It is award-winning SFTP client, SCP client, FTPS client and FTP client integrated into one software program for file transfer to FTP server or secure SFTP server. [More]
And it's free!
Site design by Black Gate