Post a reply

Before posting, please read how to report bug or request support effectively.

Bug reports without an attached log file are usually useless.

Options
Add an Attachment

If you do not want to add an Attachment to your Post, please leave the Fields blank.

(maximum 10 MB; please compress large files; only common media, archive, text and programming file formats are allowed)

Options

Topic review

martin

benh57 wrote:

I think we figured this out. WinSCP was defaulting to AES. Blowfish is MUCH faster. I suspect pscp is defaulting to blowfish. (haven't checked, though)

PSCP also uses AES be default.

Blowfish is plenty secure for us, so we just disabled AES on the server. blowfish gets used as fallback by winscp.

You can change the algorithm on SSH tab of login dialog.
benh57

Haven't tried the 0.58 putty - i don't think that was it.

I think we figured this out. WinSCP was defaulting to AES. Blowfish is MUCH faster. I suspect pscp is defaulting to blowfish. (haven't checked, though)

Blowfish is plenty secure for us, so we just disabled AES on the server. blowfish gets used as fallback by winscp.
martin

Re: WinSCP much slower than pscp -scp

Can you try the same with PuTTY 0.58, just to verify that the integration would have a speed benefit?
benh57

WinSCP much slower than pscp -scp

Putty 0.60's "pscp.exe -scp" gets me about 2,000 kB/sec of speed over WinSCP (using SCP) 4.0.4 with default connection settings. (force SCP on)

Could this be beacuse WinSCP is using an older version of putty code? Any plans to integrate 0.60?

thanks,

-Ben