Post a reply

Options
Add an Attachment

If you do not want to add an Attachment to your Post, please leave the Fields blank.

(maximum 10 MB; please compress large files; only common media, archive, text and programming file formats are allowed)

Options

Topic review

martin

Re: About WebDAV

smaragdus wrote:

So I am impatient to see the WebDAV support implemented in WinSCP, which will make it even more powerful and universal (it will lack only S3 support).

See also Setting up an SFTP Access to Amazon S3.
martin

Anonymous wrote:

I understand. But what does WebDAV functionality add? I read the Wikipedia page about Webdav but I don't see how i can use it in daily practise, using Winscp (or any other Webdav client).

Well, if your server supports WebDAV only, your have to use it.
Guest

I understand. But what does WebDAV functionality add? I read the Wikipedia page about Webdav but I don't see how i can use it in daily practise, using Winscp (or any other Webdav client).
martin

Anonymous wrote:

According to many, dumb questions do not exists.
Can somebody explain to me what is so great about Webdav support in Winscp?

I suppose it's great for those who like WinSCP and need to use WebDAV, but had to use other clients for WebDAV until now.
Guest

According to many, dumb questions do not exists.
Can somebody explain to me what is so great about Webdav support in Winscp?
Grateful

Thank you Martin, AWESOME this works like a charm with Liferay Webdav! You are our hero Martin!
XAVlER

Map network drive

+ 1 On the map network drive request
martin

Re: WinSCP 5.6 beta with WebDAV support

GregH wrote:

So I opened a session with the gui ... works great!!! good work! but when I try it with the .net library (in powershell) I get a 400 error bad request with the same sessionOptions as the gui session.

Please start a new thread for this issue and attach a session log file (set Session.SessionLogPath).
GregH

Re: WinSCP 5.6 beta with WebDAV support

Petr wrote:

Just released #WinSCP 5.6 beta with many improvements, incl. WebDAV support!


So I opened a session with the gui ... works great!!! good work! but when I try it with the .net library (in powershell) I get a 400 error bad request with the same sessionOptions as the gui session.

I've tried a bunch of permutations of the hostname, including the username and the starting directory. But no luck.

Any idea why this would be?

using non-secure webdav, with hostname, password and username set.
martin

Re: Wuhu exactly in time!

Felix- wrote:

Since yesterday I am in need for a webdav solution for windows and now I found that beta version of winSCP!!
Works without problems!

Thanks for your feedback!
Felix-

Wuhu exactly in time!

Thanks so much!
Since yesterday I am in need for a webdav solution for windows and now I found that beta version of winSCP!!
Works without problems!
<3
Petr

WinSCP 5.6 beta with WebDAV support

Just released #WinSCP 5.6 beta with many improvements, incl. WebDAV support!
Rav

+1 Webdav support

Than could be great if you can add webdav support!
nhirschler

Woot!

+1 Very excited for WebDAV support coming soon. When is the ETA?
EagleXK

+1 for WebDAV

When?! :roll:
smaragdus

About WebDAV

I am glad to hear that support for WebDAV is planned, since more and more services offer no FTP but WebDAV only. For WebDAV now I use the no longer developed/abandoned BitKinex and the java-based AnyClient since I do not like the interface of Cyberduck. So I am impatient to see the WebDAV support implemented in WinSCP, which will make it even more powerful and universal (it will lack only S3 support). Many thanks to Martin Prikryl for working on WebDAV support.
Petr

Good news! A prototype of WebDAV sessions is finally coming in WinSCP 5.2. See tracker #160. However there is no release date planned yet for 5.2.
Joschi

How to use webdav

Again I still don't get th equestion to wich service I want to connect.

It's the same question when you ask "To wich ftp servers do you want to connect"

Webdav is just another protocol, and servers are several, for example all of my 10 domains I'm admin for are using webdav for images and content.
Also lot of web-hosters like 1&1 or alfahosting are providing webdav features.

So webdav is widely used.

Also e.g. svn hosts do have webdav autocommit (sometimes)

So, just webdav as the spec. says would be fine (and afterwards some finetuning)

so http or https; server and port, and maybe some username/password in basic or digest auth.

Anything missing?
Joschi

Webdav

Still want webdav...

PS: how to use? Uhm, just as any other protocol like ftp/scp

Only the connection is different. (or am I wrong?)

But as I saw from the sourcecode, winscp uses oensource for ftp I think from filezilla and they don't support da. Therefore when they do winscp will do ;)
beefiron

Webdav support

Just want to add my voice to this. WinSCP is a wonderful product and WebDAV access would really add to it.
SteveDaves

Need this so bad.

WEBDAV +1

4 years :roll: , come on now get your act in gear.

If I start learning my way around WinSCP source now I'll probably end up developing it for my own use by the time you lot get around to it :!:
Mr. Brazzi

WebDAV!!!... WebDAV!!!... WebDAV!!!

+10 to WebDAV support!!!... :wink:
snoukkis

+1
duebel13

+1
gerlos

please add WebDAV support!

+1

Actually, adding WebDAV support to WinSCP it could became my ultimate file transfer tool... I could not only SFTP on my servers, but I could also access a lot of webdav resources, like Dropbox through DropDAV <invalid hyperlink removed by admin> !!!

please add this feature!!!
Artales

Yes please

+1 :D
OR

+1 to WebDAV
Enzy

+1
Kramer

Re: +1 and a link to Cyberduck's WebDAV doc page

+1 This would be great! I use WinSCP for everything. Now I must seek out a WebDAV client. :(
marclaporte

+1 and a link to Cyberduck's WebDAV doc page

Hi Martin!

I'd also like to voice my support for WebDAV in WinSCP.

I work on Tiki, a full-featured, open source, multilingual, all-in-one Wiki+CMS+Groupware written in PHP. We recently added support for WebDAV:
https://doc.tiki.org/WebDAV

The goal is to give a double-click edit and save interface to access files, instead of the cumbersome download, edit, save locally and re-upload.

Possibly there is some code that could be re-used coming from Cyberduck, another GPL project:
https://cyberduck.io/webdav/

Best regards,

M ;-)
Guest

Wow

No update for two years? Sad.
Juan

It would be awesome.

It would be awesome.
Guest

yet another +1
Guest

+1
sulliwane

webdav implementation

+1

it would be wonderfull to have webdav implemented on winscp
phillwilt

another +1
molbis

WevDav support in WinSCP

WevDav support in WinSCP ???
IAmAI

+1
macriis

WebDAV in WinSCP

+1
davidchoy

+1
davidchoy

please implement dav for winscp. how can i help test?

please, please, please, please, someone implment webdav for winscp. if it's not a top priority it should be. countless people need a simple way to pass files over the web and windows frankly is just terrible at dav - even in seven.

winscp could CHANGE THE WORLD by implementing DAV!!!!

how can i help test??
boozedog

+1

Please!!!
TocydLive

WebDav support

+1
ernest

webdav

+1 webdav over https with client certificates :)
Joschi

WebDav...

Still a very highly needed feature.

I guess when Filezilla implements webdav and webdavs it'll be very quickly available in winscp.

But in the filezilla forum it's the same long thread as it's here.

Anyway, keep on the good work, and I look forward to webdav...
Guest

+1 for webDAV support
joho

Really needed

With such an awesome client that WinSCP has become, WebDAV and WebDAVS would be an awesome addition. Many of the current clients out there really suck, in a word. They're either outdated, shaky, or just plain silly.

With collaboration suites, other than MS becoming more and more standard, WebDAV* support would enhance the user's functionality quite a bit.

As a next-level, mapping up a drive letter would be sweet.

It's a real shame Microsoft din't "get it" for such a long time with WebDAV, it would have made a big difference.


-joho
andreas

yes

+1
consistency

+1
Joschi

webdav

Is there some work going on?

A lot of things in the tracker exists and are on status NEW but no change for a long time.

So as I said before webdav (with basic/digest auth) and via https... would be awesome.
Rebel6381

Need WebDAV support

+1 for webDAV support
martin

Anonymous wrote:

I'm wanting to use it with my University's Netfiles program. It's been a while since this post has last been visited, I'm wondering if there is any progress that has been made?

No. Sorry.
Guest

+1

I'm wanting to use it with my University's Netfiles program. It's been a while since this post has last been visited, I'm wondering if there is any progress that has been made?
gizzle

+1
werchter

+1 WebDav
bofh.bug

Re: webDav

+1 on WebDav over TLS/SSL (I would also donate 30 euro when it is realized.)
jfawcett

webDav

+1
Vitaly

+ webdav

Martin, +1. WebFolders client of Windows is a piece of shit. Please allocate a time for it.
SmithRy

WinSCP + Webdav = Wholesome Goodness!

Me too!
Joschi

+1 on WebDav
WebDavUser

+1 request

+1 request
Jack73

WinSCP is great...but I need to transfer files using webdav

so, I hope that (not too far away) winscp will support webdav. (at least basic funcion (list directory, copy files))
bofh

many docs an about webdav Specifications on <invalid hyperlink removed by admin>

some opensource programs to take a idee about the code
<invalid hyperlink removed by admin>
and also
<invalid hyperlink removed by admin>

I hope it helps!
Dan

So what is the current status? Are there any plans to integrate WebDAVS into Winscp?
loki

nice
martin

Re: Please Offer WebDav

OK, raising priority.
Brent

Please Offer WebDav

WebDav would really round out the capabilities of WINSCP. With all the Collaboration servers that are being installed - more and more of my work is done through Webdav.
martin

Re: webdav

OK, this issue has been added to tracker.
Guest

WebDAV support in WinSCP

I'm missing WEBDAV (WEBDAVS) client for windows. I'll really appreciate if WinSCP offered support also for this protocol.