Post a reply

Before posting, please read how to report bug or request support effectively.

Bug reports without an attached log file are usually useless.

Options
Add an Attachment

If you do not want to add an Attachment to your Post, please leave the Fields blank.

(maximum 10 MB; please compress large files; only common media, archive, text and programming file formats are allowed)

Options

Topic review

martin

Re: New User

I guess that is why you have the plugins for the "normal" file managers? So now my question is, why should the normal file managers get all the users, because of some the great plugin, when your file manager is soo much cooler?

OK. Unfortunatelly WinSCP was not designed to work with two local folders. It would require hude changes, which would take long time. There are many features in the wishlist still. And as others programs do not have them, they have higher priority.

So maybe, but not soon.
Guest

Re: New User

martin wrote:

If you do not require secure transfers and you have two PCs connected over LAN, wou may use standard Windows file sharing. Am I right?


Partially right. But you may want to have the flexibility to use the program both for "local" file management, over a secure network, as well as for managing files over an insecure network, which in essense SCP is made for.

I guess that is why you have the plugins for the "normal" file managers? So now my question is, why should the normal file managers get all the users, because of some the great plugin, when your file manager is soo much cooler?
martin

Re: New User

Jacob wrote:

You could make a large increase in the user base if the program was also suited for normal file management (e.g. transfering files between two PCs). What is the difficulty in making the SCP connection optional, in the sense that establishing a SCP connection is not a requirement for running the program?

If you do not require secure transfers and you have two PCs connected over LAN, wou may use standard Windows file sharing. Am I right?
Jacob

Re: New User

martin wrote:

WinSCP is intended to connect to SSH server. It is generally not suitable for transfering file between two PCs.

But you can of course install SSH server to one of the PCs.


You could make a large increase in the user base if the program was also suited for normal file management (e.g. transfering files between two PCs). What is the difficulty in making the SCP connection optional, in the sense that establishing a SCP connection is not a requirement for running the program?

Regards,

Jacob
martin

Re: New User

WinSCP is intended to connect to SSH server. It is generally not suitable for transfering file between two PCs.

But you can of course install SSH server to one of the PCs.
gfellmayer

New User

All I want is to use WinSCP like a Norton commander to compare and sync files between my PC and my notebook. when I call up the program it is asking for
Host Name, User Name and Passwork...
What does all that mean..
thank you...