Post a reply

Before posting, please read how to report bug or request support effectively.

Bug reports without an attached log file are usually useless.

Options
Add an Attachment

If you do not want to add an Attachment to your Post, please leave the Fields blank.

(maximum 10 MB; please compress large files; only common media, archive, text and programming file formats are allowed)

Options

Topic review

martin

ks wrote:

Ok, thanks. When will this be in the official release?

I aim for this or the next week.
ks

Ok, thanks. When will this be in the official release?
martin

ks wrote:

Well, I tried it and when I copy files from/to the server I see the panel shows up quickly with no delay. Is that the thing you wanted me to test?

Yes. Thanks for your feedback. Let me know if anything goes wrong.

Is this behavior optional or 'for everybody'?

It's "for everybody".
ks

Well, I tried it and when I copy files from/to the server I see the panel shows up quickly with no delay. Is that the thing you wanted me to test? Is this behavior optional or 'for everybody'?
martin

Re: 2 minor issues of new versions

I have sent you an email with a development version of WinSCP to address you have used to register on this forum.
martin

Re: 2 minor issues of new versions

ks wrote:

Sometimes the network is slow and it seems this keeps the panel hidden noticeably longer than usual.

OK, that's true. Will take a look.
ks

Re: 2 minor issues of new versions

Sometimes the network is slow and it seems this keeps the panel hidden noticeably longer than usual.
martin

Re: 2 minor issues of new versions

ks wrote:

As time goes by the copy panel seems to become slower and slower which irritates me quite. Can you fix this sooner?

Is this your impression or a fact? :)
ks

Re: 2 minor issues of new versions

ks wrote:

The progress panel for copy shows up only after some time (a split of a second) - I know this is not to show it completely for quick operations, but the result is WinSCP seems slow or non-responsive. I would like the old behavior back, probably as an option.

martin wrote:

OK, will consider this.

As time goes by the copy panel seems to become slower and slower which irritates me quite. Can you fix this sooner?
ks

Thanks for the answers.
martin

Re: 2 minor issues of new versions

ks wrote:

The progress panel for copy shows up only after some time (a split of a second) - I know this is not to show it completely for quick operations, but the result is WinSCP seems slow or non-responsive. I would like the old behavior back, probably as an option.

OK, will consider this.

Is it possible to select any icons via settings?

No. The old icons were discontinued. We have no capacity to maintain separate sets of icons. Note that we obviously add new icons now and then for new features.

Overall I'm disappointed with the interface changes in the new version 5.5 and looks like you had nothing to do but mess up what already had worked fine :)

I'm sorry for that, but generally we received positive feedback on the changes.

I forgot 1 thing: is there a way to control the font of the Terminal window (Ctrl-T)?

Not yet.
Option for configurable font size is tracked here:
https://winscp.net/tracker/364
ks

I forgot 1 thing: is there a way to control the font of the Terminal window (Ctrl-T)?
ks

2 minor issues of new versions

Hello.

The progress panel for copy shows up only after some time (a split of a second) - I know this is not to show it completely for quick operations, but the result is WinSCP seems slow or non-responsive. I would like the old behavior back, probably as an option.

New icons - I like the old ones style, and the new icon set is really stupid. Also, I now have to search for the icons I used to know well, like Refresh, in order to do basic actions. Is it possible to select any icons via settings? I could not even find the new icons in the exe's resources using ResHacker.

Overall I'm disappointed with the interface changes in the new version 5.5 and looks like you had nothing to do but mess up what already had worked fine :)