Differences

This shows you the differences between the selected revisions of the page.

2013-05-19 2015-01-29
Restored revision 1365771065. Undoing revision 1368970458. (martin) (hidden) non-interactive password authentication methods exist (martin)
Line 18: Line 18:
==== Reasons why the feature is not built into ==== ==== Reasons why the feature is not built into ====
  * [[SFTP]] protocol does not allow this.   * [[SFTP]] protocol does not allow this.
-  * With [[SCP]] protocol it may be theoretically possible. However it has many drawbacks. It would require not only major changes in WinSCP, but also many configuration changes on both servers to allow authenticate on the second server from the first one (note that it would not be possible to use password authentication). See [[custom_commands#fxp|scp custom command]] for details. So practically it would have advantage for advanced users only, who can use the "custom command" solution easily.+  * With [[SCP]] protocol it may be theoretically possible. However it has many drawbacks. It would require not only major changes in WinSCP, but also many configuration changes on both servers to allow authenticate on the second server from the first one (note that it would not be possible to use an interactive password authentication). See [[custom_commands#fxp|scp custom command]] for details. So practically it would have advantage for advanced users only, who can use the "custom command" solution easily.
  * For [[FTP]] protocol has an FXP extension that allows this, but it is not supported by WinSCP. [[bug>309]]   * For [[FTP]] protocol has an FXP extension that allows this, but it is not supported by WinSCP. [[bug>309]]

Last modified: by martin