Differences

This shows you the differences between the selected revisions of the page.

2017-01-08 2017-03-10
via_local explicit anchor (martin) no summary (12.29.252.5) (hidden) (untrusted)
Line 20: Line 20:
  * With the [[SCP]] protocol it may be theoretically possible. However it has many drawbacks. It would require not only major changes in WinSCP, but also many configuration changes on both servers to allow authentication on the second server from the first one (note that it would not be possible to use an interactive password authentication). See the [[custom_commands#fxp|scp custom command]] for details. So practically it would have advantage for advanced users only, who can use the "custom command" solution easily.   * With the [[SCP]] protocol it may be theoretically possible. However it has many drawbacks. It would require not only major changes in WinSCP, but also many configuration changes on both servers to allow authentication on the second server from the first one (note that it would not be possible to use an interactive password authentication). See the [[custom_commands#fxp|scp custom command]] for details. So practically it would have advantage for advanced users only, who can use the "custom command" solution easily.
  * The [[FTP]] protocol has an [[wp>File_eXchange_Protocol|FXP extension]] that allows this, but it is disabled on majority of FTP servers. [[bug>309]]   * The [[FTP]] protocol has an [[wp>File_eXchange_Protocol|FXP extension]] that allows this, but it is disabled on majority of FTP servers. [[bug>309]]
 +erfdfb        ffffffffff

Last modified: by 12.29.252.5