Differences

This shows you the differences between the selected revisions of the page.

2016-10-08 2016-10-10
rephrased it (sentences with 4 commas...) , removed unneeded details - that is using the public scripting interface is not a detail which matter in the license. Also if a text is using "simply said", well then maybe the text is not that good. (Julian304) the details matter, as people keep asking for them + usage of the executable via its public scripting interface is actually important in the respect to the GPL license (martin)
Line 189: Line 189:
The WinSCP .NET Assembly is a free library: you can use it, redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the [[https://www.mozilla.org/MPL/2.0/|Mozilla Public License Version 2.0]]. The WinSCP .NET Assembly is a free library: you can use it, redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the [[https://www.mozilla.org/MPL/2.0/|Mozilla Public License Version 2.0]].
-Because WinSCP uses [[license|the GPL license]] it's important to keep the %%GPL%% license file around. Your software doesn't have to be licensed under GPL as the  WinSCP .NET Assembly is using WinSCP as an executable and not as a library.+Because WinSCP uses [[license|the GPL license]] it's important to keep the %%GPL%% license file around.((Simply said, keep all files from ''winscpXXXautomation.zip'' package together.)) Your software doesn't have to be licensed under GPL as the  WinSCP .NET Assembly is using WinSCP as an executable, via its public [[scripting|scripting interface]], and not as a library.

Last modified: by martin