Forum » Support and Bug Reports »

Post a reply

Before posting, please read how to report bug or request support effectively.

Bug reports without an attached log file are usually useless.

Username

Subject

Message body

Font colour:

Font size:

Options

Disable BBCode in this post

Notify me when a reply is posted (registered users only)

Add an Attachment

If you do not want to add an Attachment to your Post, please leave the Fields blank.

Filename

(maximum 10 MB; please compress large files; only common media, archive, text and programming file formats are allowed)

File Comment

Options

Private file (available to author and site moderators only)

Topic review

vitez

Re: WinSCP 5.17.6 transfers at less than half the speed than FileZilla 3.48.1

2020-07-24 08:29

martin wrote:

Diky za test.

Za malo.

martin

Re: WinSCP 5.17.6 transfers at less than half the speed than FileZilla 3.48.1

2020-07-24

Diky za test.

vitez

Re: WinSCP 5.17.6 transfers at less than half the speed than FileZilla 3.48.1

2020-07-21 09:18

martin wrote:

vitez wrote:

bez TLS:
WinSCP 90MB/s
FileZilla 115MB/S

Bez TLS (bez sifrovani)? Nebo bez TLS 1.3 (tj. s TLS 1.2)?

bez sifrovani

martin

Re: WinSCP 5.17.6 transfers at less than half the speed than FileZilla 3.48.1

2020-07-21

vitez wrote:

bez TLS:
WinSCP 90MB/s
FileZilla 115MB/S

Bez TLS (bez sifrovani)? Nebo bez TLS 1.3 (tj. s TLS 1.2)?

vitez

Re: WinSCP 5.17.6 transfers at less than half the speed than FileZilla 3.48.1

2020-07-17 16:55

bez TLS:
WinSCP 90MB/s
FileZilla 115MB/S
zase s TLS 1.3:
WinSCP 27MB/s
FileZilla 42MB/s 1 jadro (ze 3) vytizene

vitez

Re: WinSCP 5.17.6 transfers at less than half the speed than FileZilla 3.48.1

2020-07-17 15:12

martin wrote:

vitez wrote:

Mám to vyzkoušet bez TLS 1.3?

Za pokus to urcite stoji.

vitez wrote:

martin wrote:

How did you check the CPU performance during transfer?
Did you check a specific CPU core? Or just the overall CPU?

All cpus. Not single CPU bound.

Prave na to se ptam. Je jedno z jader vytizene nebo ne?

neni.
Zkusim bez TLS.

martin

Re: WinSCP 5.17.6 transfers at less than half the speed than FileZilla 3.48.1

2020-07-17

vitez wrote:

Mám to vyzkoušet bez TLS 1.3?

Za pokus to urcite stoji.

vitez wrote:

martin wrote:

How did you check the CPU performance during transfer?
Did you check a specific CPU core? Or just the overall CPU?

All cpus. Not single CPU bound.

Prave na to se ptam. Je jedno z jader vytizene nebo ne?

vitez

Re: WinSCP 5.17.6 transfers at less than half the speed than FileZilla 3.48.1

2020-07-15 13:31

Mám to vyzkoušet bez TLS 1.3?

vitez

Re: WinSCP 5.17.6 transfers at less than half the speed than FileZilla 3.48.1

2020-07-15 12:42

Using another PC on the same Gigabit LAN with Linux and lftp (again TLS 1.3 over both channels):
1073741824 bytes transferred in 19 seconds (53.23 MiB/s)
lftp defaulttrial@192.168.2.140:/>
So it seems to be a WinSCP problem.

vitez

Re: WinSCP 5.17.6 transfers at less than half the speed than FileZilla 3.48.1

2020-07-15 11:06

martin wrote:

How did you check the CPU performance during transfer?
Did you check a specific CPU core? Or just the overall CPU?

All cpus. Not single CPU bound.

martin

Re: WinSCP 5.17.6 transfers at less than half the speed than FileZilla 3.48.1

2020-07-15

How did you check the CPU performance during transfer?
Did you check a specific CPU core? Or just the overall CPU?

vitez

WinSCP 5.17.6 transfers at less than half the speed than FileZilla 3.48.1

2020-07-15 07:21

It was the same speed difference (over a 1Gbit connection) with former versions of both programs, actually. WinSCP brings about 23MB/s both ways and FileZilla around 55/MB/s. The FTP server is my own, running pure-ftpd 1.0.47-3. Neither with WinSCP nor FileZilla is my FTP server CPU bound during transfers.
In both cases I am using FTP with explicit TLS 1.3, also for data.
Both FTP clients run on the same Windows 10 system. The speed difference can be reproduced at all times.