Post a reply

Options
Add an Attachment

If you do not want to add an Attachment to your Post, please leave the Fields blank.

(maximum 10 MB; please compress large files; only common media, archive, text and programming file formats are allowed)

Options

Topic review

martin

It's the next big thing on my todo list.
itppftp

Any news on this request?
itppftp

In some form yes, but I am assuming a few things,

  1. There is a Queue which utilizes multiple connections, this works and the code is there.
  2. A sync job produces a change list (up or/and download)
  3. Pass this list (2) to (1) (push to background)
    This should result in using multiple streams (connections) when processing a change list.

    It would be nice if #4 can be done, but I can use autoit to control the GUI steps in an automated fashion.

    If #4 is really complex, let's discuss #4 at a later stage.
  4. Introduce a script switch which does the same from a script job.
itppftp

I've send you an email about donation and maybe to sponsor this request. Pse. have a look at my email and indicate what the minimum requirement is for sponsorship.
itppftp

Allow lists such as from synchronization results to be pushed to the queue

Allow lists such as from synchronization results (preview changes) to be pushed to the queue (allow use of multiple connections).

I am aware synchronization from a script using multiple streams (connections) only works from C# and PowerShell (which are complex scripts compared to the default script from WinSCP).

But when you upload/download multiple files in the background (Queue) it uses multiple streams just fine, so why not push the result list from a synchronization session to the Queue and benefit from multiple streams? (and of course have it available from default WinSCP scripting).