Post a reply

Before posting, please read how to report bug or request support effectively.

Bug reports without an attached log file are usually useless.

Options
Add an Attachment

If you do not want to add an Attachment to your Post, please leave the Fields blank.

(maximum 10 MB; please compress large files; only common media, archive, text and programming file formats are allowed)

Options

Topic review

robertf

Re: Synchronization between two 'local' folders?

Thank you. I have just voted for issue 2020.

martin wrote:

I'm not sure I follow what you mean by the last sentence.

I meant that I do not want to do automatic synchronization (I'd rather do it manually) but I do want to do comparisons of complete directory trees. I do such comparisons by using Synchronize but with the Preview box checked, so I can view the results of the initial comparison, without doing the actual synchronization.
martin

Re: Synchronization between two 'local' folders?

Thanks for your suggestion.

This request is being tracked already:
Issue 2020 – Synchronize two local directories
You can vote for it there.

I'm not sure I follow what you mean by the last sentence.
robertf

Synchronization between two 'local' folders?

We can now open a tab with a local directory on both sides, which is wonderful. However, Commands > Synchronize is greyed out in that case. Is there a fundamental reason why synchronization is not possible for two local directory trees?

The second 'local' directory is generally a mapped drive or a connected device, but there might be times when both directories were really 'local'. What I'm really interested in is a recursive comparison, but that seems to be possible only by asking for a synchronization but remembering to check the 'Preview changes' box.

Thank you.