Re: Invalid response to PWD command - Features
The problem is that your server violates FTP specification by sending two230
responses toPASS
command. That confused WinSCP, which from that moment matched its request with wrong responses, until this ultimately failed when trying to parse response toFEAT
command as a response toPWD
command. While WinSCP could theoretically be more tolerant to such a wrong behavior, a root cause is with your server.
> 2014-05-05 15:38:18.010 PASS *************
< 2014-05-05 15:38:20.452 230 User {ftp_username_masked} logged in
< 2014-05-05 15:38:20.452 230 Yu con xie n2015-02-28 23:29:42,{ftp_username_masked}
For clarification, the server is not mine. The server belongs to a vendor.
I will notify the vendor of your observations about their server.
Thanks again.