Forum » Support and Bug Reports »

Post a reply

Before posting, please read how to report bug or request support effectively.

Bug reports without an attached log file are usually useless.

Options
Add an Attachment

If you do not want to add an Attachment to your Post, please leave the Fields blank.

(maximum 10 MB; please compress large files; only common media, archive, text and programming file formats are allowed)

Options

Topic review

martin

emzetor wrote:

Couldn't it be somewhere in preferences?

Sure, it could. Let's wait if more users ask for this.
emzetor

Thanks for your feedback. I know it's quite a problem, when M.soft farts on standards.
Couldn't it be somewhere in preferences?
martin

Re: Stupid ordering of dirs/files by name

Well, I believe Windows application should behave as Windows do.

Anyway, your disagreement was recorded:
https://winscp.net/tracker/425
emzetor

Stupid ordering of dirs/files by name

Using last 5.70 version on XP czech. This sorting method forced me to go back to the previous WinSCP version. Is it possible to set this somewhere to classic sorting?
Example - is this correctly sorted? NO! :x

    aktual_5.01
    aktual_5.02
    aktual_5.03
    aktual_5.04
    aktual_5.05
    aktual_5.5x_b
    aktual_5.5x_t
    aktual_5.06
    aktual_5.07
    aktual_5.08
    aktual_5.09
    aktual_5.10
... etc

Well, it's the same as in Windows Explorer 7 and 8.1, but in XP it is wrong
btw, above order example is taken from the remote non-windows system.
WinSCP might not be as stupid creation as Windows :evil:

Documentation

Support

Associations

Follow Us