Excluded Files Mask

Advertisement

n/a
Guest

Excluded Files Mask

Files should not be excluded if:

1) The user explicitly clicks on a single file to transfer.
2) it is to be edited. At least put up a notice telling me that the file wasn't transfered because of the mask - it currently just errors with the temporary file not found.

Reply with quote

Advertisement

martin
Site Admin
martin avatar
Joined:
Posts:
28,802
Location:
Prague, Czechia

Re: Excluded Files Mask

n/a wrote:

1) The user explicitly clicks on a single file to transfer.
This is questionable. What if you select two files? :-)
2) it is to be edited. At least put up a notice telling me that the file wasn't transfered because of the mask - it currently just errors with the temporary file not found.
I agree with this. I'll make WinSCP ignore exclude mask for editing.
_________________
Martin Prikryl

Reply with quote

Anton P.
Guest

Re: Excluded Files Mask

martin wrote:

n/a wrote:

1) The user explicitly clicks on a single file to transfer.
This is questionable. What if you select two files? :-)

Moreover, I mainly use exclude masks to exclude files which are typically very large, in order to prevent me from absent-mindedly transferring an enormous file to a remote filestore where I have a low space quota. To me it makes no difference whether it's one file or lots of files.

Reply with quote

Advertisement

You can post new topics in this forum