is it possible to choose the source port?
version 3.76
SFTP/SCP
norton commander
Hi Martin,
Thanks in advance for a great product! I use it all the time now and it's fantastic. I appreciate all of the work you put into making the synchronizing capabilities very strong. It has really simplified my life.
Now onto the question. I have a situation that I'm not sure how to get around... In order to gain access to Computer B, I have to ssh tunnel through computer A (it's a security measure that i have no control over). I'd like to be able to use winSCP to graphically interact with computer B. The only way that I can think of to do this would be to forward the source port winSCP is using through computer A (using the -L xxxx:com.put.erB.IP:22 command). Unfortunately, it appears as if winSCP chooses a random port in the high 3000 range, so I can't use the (-L) approach unless i know the source port first. Would it be possible to integrate an option into the parameters that allows one to choose the source port #?
Alternatively, if you can think of a simpler way to do what I'm interested in, I'm definitely up for the suggestions!
thanks,
-Z
SFTP/SCP
norton commander
Hi Martin,
Thanks in advance for a great product! I use it all the time now and it's fantastic. I appreciate all of the work you put into making the synchronizing capabilities very strong. It has really simplified my life.
Now onto the question. I have a situation that I'm not sure how to get around... In order to gain access to Computer B, I have to ssh tunnel through computer A (it's a security measure that i have no control over). I'd like to be able to use winSCP to graphically interact with computer B. The only way that I can think of to do this would be to forward the source port winSCP is using through computer A (using the -L xxxx:com.put.erB.IP:22 command). Unfortunately, it appears as if winSCP chooses a random port in the high 3000 range, so I can't use the (-L) approach unless i know the source port first. Would it be possible to integrate an option into the parameters that allows one to choose the source port #?
Alternatively, if you can think of a simpler way to do what I'm interested in, I'm definitely up for the suggestions!
thanks,
-Z