Shell property is disregarded

Advertisement

braykov
Joined:
Posts:
92

Shell property is disregarded

I am with version 5.2.1 and I remember it used to work with 5.1.4 but even with a portable version, I couldn't make it work again. So:
I am loggin in on AIX 6.1 where the default shell is ksh (version 88f). I want it to login automatically with ksh93 (93e).
So I setup Shell: /usr/bin/ksh93
But when I open PuTTY terminal, it logs me in with the default ksh.

Directly send me a debug version to generate a trace file.
I tried logging a debug 2 type file, but it doesn't show much.
Of course it's up to you to judge :-)

Reply with quote

Advertisement

martin
Site Admin
martin avatar
Joined:
Posts:
29,033
Location:
Prague, Czechia

Re: Shell property is disregarded

Are you refering to Open in PuTTY command?
_________________
Martin Prikryl

Reply with quote

martin
Site Admin
martin avatar
Joined:
Posts:
29,033
Location:
Prague, Czechia

Ok, the Shell setting is indeed not exported to PuTTY and it NEVER was.
And I do not think it should. The option is there not to allow you to select your favourite shell, but to select shell compatible with WinSCP. What is generally the least user-friendly shell, so exactly contrary to what you want to use with PuTTY.

You can create a stored session in PuTTY with the same name as WinSCP session to make WinSCP open that session, instead of exporting its own settings to PuTTY.

Reply with quote

Advertisement

braykov
Joined:
Posts:
92

OK, 10x, I'll play with PuTTY.

EDIT:
unfortunately I will have to stop using CTRL+P with WinSCP, because:
-m option doesn't work like that. It takes the filename of a _local_ file on your Windows system.

Reply with quote

braykov
Joined:
Posts:
92

Also, it seems I will have to use KiTTY now.
I see that the integration request has been implemented/resolved in 5.2.2.
How can we get this version?

Reply with quote

martin
Site Admin
martin avatar
Joined:
Posts:
29,033
Location:
Prague, Czechia

braykov wrote:

-m option doesn't work like that. It takes the filename of a _local_ file on your Windows system.
You are right. But it's not a problem to create one, right?

braykov wrote:

Also, it seems I will have to use KiTTY now.
Why?

Reply with quote

braykov
Joined:
Posts:
92

martin wrote:

Why?
At least because KiTTY has the following two needed options:

    - Auto-login password (for saved sessions)
    - Command (for me to run /bin/ksh93)

Putty doesn't have that.

Reply with quote

Advertisement

braykov
Joined:
Posts:
92

martin wrote:

But it's not a problem to create one, right?
Well, I can create one, but then I need different files for different sessions.
The option is one for opening any PuTTY session. I have different servers: AIX, Red Hat.
It just gets more complicated.

Reply with quote

martin
Site Admin
martin avatar
Joined:
Posts:
29,033
Location:
Prague, Czechia

braykov wrote:

- Auto-login password (for saved sessions)
WinSCP can pass its password to PuTTY.
You should better use Pageant anyway.

[quote]- Command (for me to run /bin/ksh93)[/list]
It's pretty unless and unreliable feature. Have you tried it yet?

Well, I can create one, but then I need different files for different sessions.
The option is one for opening any PuTTY session. I have different servers: AIX, Red Hat.
It just gets more complicated.
But that's the same with KiTTY -cmd option. Or do you want to create stored sessions in KiTTY (not to have WinSCP export its sessions to PuTTY)?
_________________
Martin Prikryl

Reply with quote

braykov
Joined:
Posts:
92

Yes, I already created saved sessions in KiTTY, and I have pinned it to the taskbar.
I cannot find any other faster way to work with terminals so far.
And I know the "send command" has a stupid implementation, but my different servers are opening with 3 different shells (csh, ksh(88), bash) which drives me crazy.

If you add support for KiTTY + the option to automatically open in the current remote WinSCP directory, that would be just great.

Reply with quote

martin
Site Admin
martin avatar
Joined:
Posts:
29,033
Location:
Prague, Czechia

braykov wrote:

If you add support for KiTTY + the option to automatically open in the current remote WinSCP directory, that would be just great.
I have sent you an email with a dev version of WinSCP with KiTTY support.
_________________
Martin Prikryl

Reply with quote

Advertisement

martin
Site Admin
martin avatar
Joined:
Posts:
29,033
Location:
Prague, Czechia

braykov wrote:

And I know the "send command" has a stupid implementation, but my different servers are opening with 3 different shells (csh, ksh(88), bash) which drives me crazy.
You can create symlink with the same name on all of these, pointing to a respective shell.
Or with new WinSCP you can create local script that produces correct shell based on, e.g. hostname. See !`command` pattern (check built-in the example [in PuTTY path combo box] that produces local file with cd command for -m switch).
_________________
Martin Prikryl

Reply with quote

braykov
Joined:
Posts:
92

martin wrote:

I have sent you an email with a dev version of WinSCP with KiTTY support.
I tested and sent you an e-mail, but, please, disregard it.
I figured how to make it work:
"C:\Program Files\kitty.exe" -cmd "cd '!/';ksh93" !U@!@
So what I did was
1 - replaced your escaped double quotes with single quotes
2 - added a semicolon with the execution of a command (in my case ksh93, which is in PATH on all systems I use)
As a result i have single connection configurations inside WinSCP. I don't need stored KiTTY sessions.
I get KiTTY openning in my current 'remote' directory location
I have my shell started and I am still under that directory.

It's all I wanted (so far ) :wink:

Reply with quote

martin
Site Admin
martin avatar
Joined:
Posts:
29,033
Location:
Prague, Czechia

Ok, thanks for testing. I'll update the defaults to use single-quotes.

Reply with quote

Advertisement

You can post new topics in this forum